Difference between revisions of "Lessons from the Asian crisis"
m (Protected "Lessons from the Asian crisis" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | Link to material: http://www. | + | '''Link to material:''' http://www.nber.org/papers/w7102 |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | <head> | ||
| + | </head> | ||
| + | <body> | ||
| + | <!-- Add this element exactly where you want the Rating-Widget to appear --> | ||
| + | <div class="rw-ui-container rw-urid-1"></div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- | ||
| + | You can add more Rating-Widgets in your site, | ||
| + | just pick some new rating-widget-unique-id (must be positive integer). | ||
| + | For example (rating-widget-unique-id = 38): | ||
| + | <div class="rw-ui-container rw-urid-38"></div> | ||
| + | --> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- Add this javascript code immediately before the </body> tag --> | ||
| + | <div class="rw-js-container"> | ||
| + | <script type="text/javascript"> | ||
| + | // Async Rating-Widget initialization. | ||
| + | function RW_Async_Init(){ | ||
| + | RW.init({ | ||
| + | uid: "1A591B1821F6BAE46033839D46DF205B", | ||
| + | huid: "127238", | ||
| + | options: { | ||
| + | style: "oxygen" | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | }); | ||
| + | RW.render(); | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | // Append Rating-Widget JavaScript library. | ||
| + | if (typeof(RW) == "undefined"){ | ||
| + | (function(){ | ||
| + | var rw = document.createElement("script"), | ||
| + | d = new Date(), ck = "Y" + d.getFullYear() + "M" + d.getMonth() + "D" + d.getDate(); | ||
| + | rw.type = "text/javascript"; rw.async = true; | ||
| + | rw.src = "http://js.rating-widget.com/external.min.js?ck=" + ck; | ||
| + | var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; | ||
| + | s.parentNode.insertBefore(rw, s); | ||
| + | })(); | ||
| + | } | ||
| + | |||
| + | </script> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | </body> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
[[Category:Finance]] | [[Category:Finance]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:35, 30 July 2019
This paper provides an asymmetric information analysis of the recent East Asian crisis. It then outlines several lessons from this crisis. First, there is a strong rationale for an international lender of last resort. Second, without appropriate conditionality for this lending, the moral hazard created by operation of an international lender of last resort can promote financial instability. Third, although capital flows did contribute to the crisis, they are a symptom rather than an underlying cause of the crisis, suggesting exchange controls are unlikely to be a useful strategy to avoid future crises. Fourth, pegged exchange-rate regimes are a dangerous strategy for emerging market countries and make financial crises more likely.
Link to material: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7102
